|
In the first three years since the local government PFI programme commenced in
1997/98, over £3 billion of capital investment has been approved, including
council housing refurbishment, schools, police, fire, magistrates court
services, care and respite homes, IT systems, leisure centres and waste
management.
Local Authorities in England and Wales employ over 2.1 million staff and spend
£70 bn a year, which accounts for around 25% of public spending. There are over
21,000 elected councilors serving on 410 local authorities. Education is the
largest service in expenditure and number employed, accounting for £20 bn in
England and £1.2 bn in Wales. Education employs 360,000 staff. Social Services
account for nearly £12 bn of expenditure in England and Wales and employ
200,000 staff. Social Service Departments administer children's and old peoples
homes and support to people in their own homes.
Local Authorities raise their income in a number of different ways; council tax
raised from council taxpayers and around 48% of expenditure comes from central
government grants. The non-domestic rate, which is set by local government
account, is 25% and the rest from local charges for services.
There has been a steady change from direct provision by the Local Authority to
the private sector controlled by the local authority, while many functions have
been taken away from Local Authorities and are now controlled by central
government bodies.
PFI has not achieved the growth that has been expected of it and government
expectations of the contribution towards the public services have yet to be met.
CCT has been replaced with Best Value, which requires the Authority to ensure
that they are delivering services in an efficient and effective manner. The
Government has required each Local Authority to undertake a review using the
following principles
-
Challenge why the service is provided at all
-
Question the quality and the cost of the service
-
Compare the service given with the best providers of a similar service
The Government is experimenting with a new pilot scheme - local public service
agreements - which are negotiated between the authority and the Government. It
will identify the extra contribution the authority is prepared to make over and
above its requirements under Best Value to achieve key national and local
priorities. In return, the Authority will receive greater freedom in the means
of delivery. The process is designed to encourage the Local Authority to
constantly raise its standing with some limited pump priming funding, which
means that the authority can receive extra money from the Government.
PPPs are promoted by government to take advantage of private sector expertise to
manage complex investment programmes. The intention is to introduce private
sector investors who put their own skills and capital into the project - the
public sector gets the benefits of commercial efficiencies and innovations and
the public should receive better value for money.
There are upwards of 38 signed PFI projects involving almost 500 schools with a
value of more than £1 billion. A further £1 billion has been allocated to
projects in various stages of development. The Government has increased the
amount of PFI credits for schools from £35 million in 1997-98 to a planned £850 million in 2003-04, with education by
far the largest sector of PFI funding in the local authority sector.
An increase in housing investment has also been announced and by 2003/04 annual
capital investments in housing will be £4 billion compared with just over £1.5
billion in 1997/98. Highway Maintenance has experienced great changes over the
last 30 years. CCT was introduced into Highways work in the early 1990s and
local authorities were obliged to separate the client function from the direct
labour organisations.
Partnerships between the public and private sectors have been used extensively
by Social Services Departments for many years. Local Authorities have used the
private sector to deliver services, and have also used the voluntary sector.
There has also been a progressive move in other areas like Planning and Leisure
Services to seek partnership agreements with the private sector, and this has
also been extended to the Fire and Rescue Service.
The process for privatising services like refuse collection and highway services
which are tangible, has moved ahead at a pace, and it would seem that all
parties are comfortable with the working relationships. There have been also
moves to involve the private sector in services like the management of housing
benefits and some IT projects, which have generally been less successful.
Participants in PFI projects complain about the length of time involved from the
initial OJEC notice until financial close. Although moves have taken place which
are designed to shorten the length of time e.g. standardisation of procedures
and documentation - nonetheless the more complex projects are still requiring
considerable amounts of time before financial close, for example over two years.
The delays and uncertainties involved add to the costs involved and make it less
attractive for constructors.
Public Private Partnerships are at the heart of the government's attempts to
revive Britain's public services and they are keen to expand the range of PPPs
which are regarded as the best way to secure the improvements in public services
within a relatively short timescale.
There will be a continuing move to PPP/PFI schemes in both central and local
government services, but the majority of public works will remain funded by
central government funding and local taxes.
|